POSTSCRIPT 2002
Dr. Linus Pauling's warnings of the
increased incidence of cancer due to the fallout from atmospheric
atomic weapons testing & the emissions of fission reactors were
largely ignored by the mainstream media during his lifetime.
Finally, in 1997,
40 years after his petition to the United Nations was denounced as
"pro-communist,"
the US National Cancer Institute announced that large numbers of
people,
especially children, were exposed to dangerous levels of radiation from
fallout.
The damage done by the US, British, & USSR testing until 1963, of
testing
by France & China and, more recently, by Pakistan, India, et al,
dispersed
vast amounts of long-lived radioactive materials into the
atmosphere.
Since much of this consists of elements such as Iodine, Cesium,
Strontium,
etc. which falling into the oceans, are ingested by oceanic organisms
such
as algae, plankton, etc. &, falling onto the ground, are taken up
by
grazing animals such as sheep & cattle, it becomes increasingly
concentrated
the higher it goes up the food chain. While we have until now
managed
to avoid the catastrophe of nuclear war, it appears that those
responsible
for protecting the security of our respective nations have, in fact,
poisoned
life on Earth for thousands of years to come.
New York Times, February
28, 2002
Almost All in U.S. Have Been Exposed to
Fallout, Study Finds
By JAMES GLANZ
In a preliminary study
that takes into account not only nuclear tests in Nevada
but also nearly all
American and Soviet nuclear tests conducted overseas
until
they were banned in
1963, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
has
found that virtually
every person who has lived in the United States since
1951 has been exposed
to radioactive fallout.
These new findings
expand on those from five years ago by the National Cancer
Institute that showed
that people living in a long, plume-shaped region
stretching from Idaho
and Montana to the Mississippi River and beyond had
a
slightly higher risk of
developing thyroid cancer because of the Nevada
tests.
The new study, which
was completed in August 2001 and was first revealed
yesterday in USA Today,
suggests that for all Americans born after 1951 "all
organs and tissues of
the body have received some radiation exposure." The
study says in highly
guarded terms that the global fallout could eventually
be
responsible for more
than 11,000 cancer deaths in the United States.
But the study said any
medical implications were uncertain because the average
American had received
almost 20 times as much radiation from medical
procedures like chest
X-rays as from fallout of all kinds over the same
period.
Dr. Charles Miller,
chief of the radiation studies branch at the agency's
National Center for
Environmental Health, said the report was merely a
"feasibility study"
that showed it was possible - should Congress request
it -
to carry out a full
analysis of the health risks of above- ground nuclear
testing.
"We were trying to
illustrate what could be done," Dr. Miller said, adding
that "it would be
irresponsible for me to speculate" on how accurate the
estimate of 11,000
deaths might be.
Still, given the
widespread exposures indicated by the study, its tentative
conclusions show that
the government has inadequately explained the cancer
risks from nuclear
tests, said Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, who
says
the follow-up research
must be carried out.
"If the threat of
exposure had been related to Americans sooner, early
diagnosis and treatment
may have saved many of these lives," said Mr. Harkin,
who has seen four
siblings die of cancer. "The release of this report is
long
overdue."
The United States
conducted more than 200 above-ground, or atmospheric, tests
of nuclear weapons from
1951 to 1963, about half of those at the Nevada Test
Site, 65 miles
northwest of Las Vegas, and the others in the Marshall Islands
and elsewhere in the
Pacific Ocean. Over the same period, the Soviet Union
exploded some 200
nuclear weapons in tests on its own territory.
Such tests release
radioactive iodine, which decays away in a matter of days,
as well as longer-lived
isotopes like radioactive cesium and strontium, which
take many decades to
disappear. The previous study, by the National Cancer
Institute, examined
fallout patterns and cancer risks caused by the release
of
iodine from the Nevada
tests.
"Their report, as far
as determining the fallout levels, was probably as
good
as could be done," said
David Wheeler, a health physicist at the Nevada Test
Site.
But he said that
deriving cancer rates was a highly uncertain process at
best.
Accordingly, the cancer
institute estimated that from 11,300 to 212,000
thyroid cancers would
result from this exposure. Most thyroid cancers are
treatable, but a small
percentage result in death.
The Centers for Disease
Control study also looks at exposures to the long-
lived radioactive
elements, which can be carried thousands of miles,
potentially causing
leukemia, breast cancer, liver cancer and other types
of
cancer. The study
estimated the exposure patterns by taking into account
the
winds after tests, the
amount of fallout created in each type of explosion
and
the rates at which
different kinds of radioactive particles fall from the
sky.
While the average
exposure of an American because of the fallout is low,
it
increases each person's
chance of developing cancer by a tiny amount,
potentially leading to
a larger number of deaths by cancer.
The study finds that
nearly all cancers caused by tests at the Nevada site
are
likely to be related to
the iodine that was the focus of the earlier work.
The
overseas tests could
cause cancer only through the long- lived elements.
The
United States is not
special in this regard; all nations will have received
the long-lived
radioactivity, but the Centers for Disease Control did not
estimate cancer rates
elsewhere.
Dr. Arjun Makhijani,
president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental
Research, an
organization dedicated to nuclear disarmament, said that while
the average exposures
indicated by the C.D.C. study were low, concentrations
in specific areas -
which still have not been determined - are likely to
have
been far above those
values.
"There are people in
these high fallout areas who are seriously affected,"
Dr.
Makhijani said. "There
is no cause for alarm, but there is a public health
issue, and the
government is not facing up to it."
|
INTERVIEW
INDEX
NO MORE WAR
RADFILMS
|